our foolocracy

Adam Smith proposed cognitive capitalism and we’re far from that.

If people really knew the so-called financial constraints were no such thing and the fiscal austerity programs are thus political choices and alternative political choices not involving harsh austerity are available – then I think the public debate would be different and ultimately different outcomes would emerge. —Bill Mitchell

How do we tap the economic wealth within our nation?

We have put ourselves into a deep hole, not merely because of government, but by runaway rent seeking, convenient extraction, unproductive scavenging, distorted speculation, crony opportunism, and incumbent plundering. Austerity is digging us deeper and will never get us out.

It’s clear we’ve failed to invent an efficient workable economy. Instead of robust planning and cooperative vision, and government funding it, we’re achieving far too little.

We’re accepting spurious counsel. What we get since Milton Friedman and the Laffer Curve, so to speak, is bubbles and dips. And the tricks of Republicans and Blue Dogs posing as tax cutters but merely tax shifting in a scheme of greed.

We endure an incapable policy against global challenges of fuel, population and trade. Slim growth over several decades was not widely shared.  The economy did not trickle down as promised.

It’s a mistake to think that because the economy starts growing again, all will be well. If the growth that occurs post-recession simply picks up where pre-recession growth left off, flowing mainly to the upper classes and with even more income inequality than we have now, the frustrations and tensions will continue to build and our troubles will not have ended.

There’s so very much wrong in our political thinking and economic understanding. In many ways. Over a long period. We’re vehement and enraged, yet we’re electing noise to represent our views and ignoring what’s abusing our worth.

Bruce Bartlett says the starve the beast theory is a crackpot theory, a favorite Republican rationalization “for Republican budgetary irresponsibility”.

There is, for instance, no historical data that would demonstrate that a balanced budget enhances gross domestic product (GDP) or any other indicator of economic productivity. —Michael Johns

By favoring Wall Street’s finance packaging, hoisting it over America’s economy while a cash hoarding corporate elite fails to innovate and reply, we’ve abandoned the economic growth we truly need.

“For years, the most profitable industry in America has been one that doesn’t design, build, or sell a single tangible thing.” —John Cassidy

A fix, they say, is to freeze government machinery, to slash budgets and offload costs, to shrink and eliminate. ‘We must balance the budget’, they say. ‘The government has too much money. And it’s not using it well. We need to stop government. Starve government. Cut taxes. Cut programs. Stop earmarks. Strip government.’

That’s the deficit myth, says Rodger Mitchell. “No evidence exists that deficits have any negative effect on our economy.”

We’re ignoring a crucial point: Government does not use our money. It creates it.

A public sector DEFICIT is equal to the private sector’s SURPLUS.  To the penny. —Stephanie Kelton

“Spending is absolutely, positively necessary for economic growth.” And the Federal Government has the exclusively unlimited power to create the funds we require.

It creates money by its spending.”

The money supply must grow enough to overcome inflation, population growth, a negative balance of payments and the needs of a growing economy.

The real problem today is lack of money.

Austerity will badly cripple us.

Federal spending creates money.

Federal taxing destroys money.

The only so-called ‘debt’ problem is that the debt is too small to recover from the recession.

The debt hawks have been telling the world the sky is falling for many decades, and they consistently have been wrong.

The real problem today is lack of money.

The debt hawks have limited Social Security, limited universal health care insurance, limited infrastructure restoration, limited research & development and limited economic growth.

They have caused more harm to America than the worst traitors and terrorists ever could dream of.

Less government spending will result in less money in our pockets. Why? Because government spending is precisely the same as adding money to the country.

“If our nation can issue a dollar bond it can issue a dollar bill.” —Thomas Edison.

When we stop government, we stop money at its source.

Federal spending creates money.

When the US government slows deficit spending, the result has been a recession in every case.

The U.S. has had 6 depressions in its history. Every one of those depressions followed a series of federal surpluses. All were cured with deficit spending.

1817-1821: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 29%. Depression began 1819.
1823-1836: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 99%. Depression began 1837.
1852-1857: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 59%. Depression began 1857.
1867-1873: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 27%. Depression began 1873.
1880-1893: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 57%. Depression began 1893.
1920-1930: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 36%. Depression began 1929.

The U.S. has had 9 recessions in the past 50 years. Each of those recessions came on the heels of deficit growth declines, and each recession was cured with deficit growth increases.

Despite all the hand-wringing and dire predictions, there is absolutely no evidence deficits cause any negative economic effect, or that large deficits are ‘unsustainable’ or must be paid for by our grandchildren.

There is a mountain of evidence that deficits are necessary for economic growth, and the larger the deficits the faster the growth.

Warren Mosler’s 11 Steps To Fix The Economy:

1.  A full ‘payroll tax holiday’ will restore ’spending power’ and, by allowing households to make their mortgage payments, will fix banks from the bottom up.

2.  A $500 per capita federal distribution to all the states to sustain employment in essential services, service debt, and reduce the need for state tax hikes.

3.  A federally-funded $8/hr job and healthcare benefits for anyone willing and able to work. The economy will improve rapidly.

4.  Making banks utilities.

5.  The Federal Reserve should lend to all member banks to ensure permanent liquidity. The FDIC already regulates and supervises all bank assets.

6. The Treasury should issue nothing longer than 3 month bills.

7.  Don’t tax good banks for losses by bad banks. This serves only to raise interest rates.

8.  Directly fund housing agencies to eliminate hedging mortgage rates.

9.  Homeowners being foreclosed should have the option to stay in their homes at fair market rents with ownership going to the government at the lower of the mortgage balance or fair market value of the home.

10.  Remove ’self imposed constraints’ that serve no public purpose. This is left over from the gold standard days and is currently inapplicable.

11.  Federal taxes function to regulate aggregate demand, not to raise revenue per se, and therefore should be increased only to cool down an overheating economy, and not to ‘pay for’ anything.

Linda Beale says, “This emphasis on the deficit seems to be off track. “

It has little or nothing to do with getting the US economy back on a good, sustainable track that will provide a decent standard of living for Americans, with sound support for a strong middle class, the backbone of the country.

Deficits aren’t the ‘evil of all evils’ that these commissions and their backers make them out to be.

The notion that federal debt is ‘unsustainable or will cause inflation’ is simply not borne out by the facts. “Spending is absolutely necessary for economic growth.”

The entire ‘reduce-the-federal-debt movement is suicidal. It’s like prescribing a reduced calorie diet to a starving patient.

Ordinary people are being called to sacrifice even more, when they are bearing already heavy burdens from the financial crisis, high unemployment and high rates of foreclosures.

In the name of deficit reduction, these ‘experts’ want us to forego tort remedies against institutions that cause life-long harms that cannot be made whole.  In the name of deficit reduction, they want us to work longer and retire with less benefits, while there is no provision for eliminating the capital gain preference giving those who have income from capital assets an easy pass on taxes.

When people or business aren’t spending, the government must spend.

That money is the fluid that drives the economy.

If it isn’t there, we will have a double dip recession or worse.

Cutting back government expenditures in the drastic ways called for now (10% of federal workers fired, etc.) will have a negative impact on the economy that will ripple through ordinary Americans’ lives.

Balancing the books will not help us because government debt isn’t our major problem.

Clearly today’s political rant is off base.

Government stimulates the economy by adding money. Deficits stimulate the economy by adding money. For that matter, agency budgets and earmarks stimulate the economy by adding money.

We’ll be in a much bigger mess if we slash and burn government spending.

A dearth of leadership, confusion among politicians, insolvent experts, and our own electorate is misdirecting us. We’re listening to calls of restraint in an era of restraint. We’re listening to old century bookkeepers that offer nothing to invigorate a desperate nation already crushed in poor distribution overridden with robbers.

The Cause and Impact of Crony Capitalism: The Great Stagnation and the Great Recession.

The current over-leveraged state of the consumer in the developed world can be papered over by increased government spending but in the face of increased cronyism, it only kicks the can further down the road.

I’ll only listen to proposals that take us to the scale and efficiency that meets our needs with ample prosperity to execute true sustainability and sensible exchange of what we call money.

The federal budget is not a household or company or state or city budget:

Whenever a demagogue wants to whip up hysteria about federal budget deficits, he or she invariably begins with an analogy to a household’s budget: “No household can continually spend more than its income, and neither can the federal government”. On the surface that, might appear sensible; dig deeper and it makes no sense at all.  —L. Randall Wray

It’s so nuts these days, Richard Nixon seems sensible:

We need new rules if we are to meet this challenge, but most of all, we need sustained and serious action and cooperation by millions of men and women if we are to achieve our objective, and that means millions of Americans across this land listening to me tonight.

Let me conclude by restating our overall objective. It can be summed up in one word that best characterizes this Nation and its essential nature. That word is “independence.” From its beginning 200 years ago, throughout its history, America has made great sacrifices of blood and also of treasure to achieve and maintain its independence. In the last third of this century, our independence will depend on maintaining and achieving self-sufficiency in energy.

What I have called Project Independence 1980 is a series of plans and goals set to insure that by the end of this decade, Americans will not have to rely on any source of energy beyond our own.

As far as energy is concerned, this means we will hold our fate and our future in our hands alone. As we look to the future, we can do so, confident that the energy crisis will be resolved not only for our time but for all time. We will once again have plentiful supplies of energy which helped to build the greatest industrial nation and one of the highest standards of living in the world.

The capacity for self-sufficiency in energy is a great goal. It is also an essential goal, and we are going to achieve it.

Tonight I ask all of you to join together in moving toward that goal, with the spirit of discipline, self-restraint, and unity which is the cornerstone of our great and good country.

A Data Driven Look at Presidents and Policies Would Be Nice

E Pluribus Unum and Our Finest Hour

The main role, the driving force, the entity that either provided the original vision and/or drove that vision through to completion was the government.

The government is providing a role that the private sector simply isn’t, cannot, and will not.

The for-profit private sector plays the role of sidekick or supporting actor, [or extracts wherever it can]. The only force that can unite the country, that can create a cause around which everyone will rally around, and then only certain circumstances, is the government.

That is why the American Empire has been petering out. We are less than two months shy of thirty years from the day when Reagan told us the government is the problem, and we have bought into that mantra hook line and sinker. And in the Tea Party era, it is hard to see how that can be turned around. The long, slow decline is becoming inevitable.

We have a dangerously poor group of leaders and thinkers these days offering little more than argument and prowess.

I’ll know we’ve found thinking leaders when plans appear that are not leverage and dominance but instead repair neglect, reduce damage, correct errors, restrain pilfering, improve sectors that are in very much trouble, and most importantly, propose a practical prosperous economy. I’m not hearing that. That’s what we’re missing.

The federal government can fund any future we can invent! When leaders offer a sensible future we’ll create it and we’ll use ample and available federal funding to get there.